For years, transgender-athlete policies have varied depending on the sports organization. The NCAA, for example, used to have a policy that allowed transgender athletes to participate through different rules depending on the sport. But in February 2025, the NCAA changed its policy. It restricted women’s competition to athletes who were assigned female at birth, while still allowing athletes assigned male at birth to practice with women’s teams and receive some of the same benefits.
The debate also became a major political issue in the United States. In January 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the federal government to treat sex as a biological classification, opposing policies that allowed transgender women and girls to compete in women’s sports. A second executive order in February 2025 specifically focused on women’s sports and Title IX.
The legal debate eventually reached the Supreme Court. In West Virginia v. B.P.J., decided on June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled that Title IX allows schools to have separate men’s and women’s sports teams based on biological sex. The Court also ruled that West Virginia and Idaho did not violate the Equal Protection Clause by restricting girls’ and women’s school sports to biological females.
The case was about school sports, not the WNBA. However, the decision became part of the bigger national debate about transgender athletes and women’s sports.
Fast forward to today, and the WNBA finds its self in an unusual position. Other major sports organizations have created more specific rules about transgender athletes, while the WNBA’s collective bargaining agreement uses a much broader definition.
What the WNBA’s Rules Actually Say About Transgender Athletes
Article XIII, Section 1 of the WNBA-WNBPA collective bargaining agreement states: “Only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA.”
The same section includes other requirements for players who want to enter the WNBA Draft, including rules about age and college eligibility. However, it does not clearly explain what standard determines whether someone qualifies as being a woman for WNBA eligibility.
The WNBA’s rules are part of a collective bargaining agreement between the league and the Women’s National Basketball Players Association. This means the league cannot simply create a major new eligibility rule without considering the players’ union and the terms of their agreement.
That is one reason Commissioner Cathy Engelbert has stressed that the issue is not something the league can simply decide on its own.
And that’s why this discussion continues to grow like wildfire, creating a bit of a sideshow for what is otherwise a breakout season for the WNBA, who is experiencing a huge ratings boost this season after the women finally got a much deserved pay increase.
Layshia Clarendon Changed the Conversation Inside the WNBA
Any discussion about transgender identity in the WNBA has to include Layshia Clarendon.
Clarendon became the first openly nonbinary player in WNBA history and is also recognized as the league’s first openly transgender player. Clarendon came out publicly as non-cisgender in 2015 and later publicly identified as transgender and nonbinary.
Clarendon played 12 WNBA seasons and became an important advocate for LGBTQIA+ inclusion and social justice. During the 2020 season, Clarendon and the New York Liberty wore “Trans Lives Matter” shirts. At that time, Clarendon had not publicly shared their own gender identity with the wider public.
Clarendon’s career is important because it shows that transgender and nonbinary identity was already part of the WNBA community before the current debate. However, Clarendon’s situation is not exactly the same as the issue the league is dealing with now.
Clarendon identifies as transgender and nonbinary. The current political debate is mostly about whether transgender women who were assigned male at birth should be allowed to compete in the WNBA’s women’s league.
Clarendon retired from the WNBA in 2024.
Sophie Cunningham Brings the Issue Into the WNBA Spotlight
The current controversy grew much bigger in July 2026 after Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham publicly supported restricting transgender women from girls’ and women’s sports.
Cunningham argued that women’s sports should be protected and talked about concerns involving young girls and women’s locker rooms. She said she did not hate transgender people, but still believed transgender women should not compete in women’s sports.
Her comments quickly became part of a much bigger political debate. White House officials publicly praised Cunningham’s position, and the Trump administration used the controversy to reinforce its broader position on transgender participation in women’s sports.
But Cunningham’s comments did not just create a debate online. They also led to protests and rallies around WNBA games.
Small rallies and demonstrations took place in Seattle and Portland as the Indiana Fever traveled through the Pacific Northwest. This showed that the debate had moved beyond social media and politics and was starting to become part of the atmosphere around actual WNBA games. That put the league in a difficult position.
The WNBA was now dealing with questions about competitive fairness, gender identity, women’s sports, federal policy and the rights of its own players. At the same time, the league had to be careful not to turn individual players into representatives of a larger political fight.
Other WNBA Players and Coaches Take a Different Position
Cunningham’s position was not shared by everyone in the WNBA.
The WNBA has more stars than ever and most have been asked to weigh in on this debate over the last few weeks. Seattle Storm center Stefanie Dolson publicly showed support for transgender rights during the controversy.
Minnesota Lynx coach Cheryl Reeve also spoke strongly in support of transgender athletes. During the controversy, Reeve said: “We need to protect trans kids. Every kid. To me, it’s a human rights issue. Every kid has a right to sports.”
Reeve also recognized that transgender participation in elite sports after puberty can raise different questions than transgender children’s ability to participate in sports. However, she argued that transgender children should still have the opportunity to play sports.
Golden State Valkyries star Gabby Williams was also very direct about her position. She said: “I would welcome a trans athlete on my team or against my team, anytime. I don’t think it’s a problem in the world. It’s just another way to kind of attack trans people.”
Williams also brought up the history of players such as Layshia Clarendon, who had spoken publicly about transgender rights. She argued that athletes have a responsibility to stand up for transgender people and said this could be the next major fight athletes have to take on.
The different opinions showed that there was no single position among WNBA players and coaches. Some saw transgender inclusion as an important part of equality, while others argued that women’s sports needed stronger protections based on biological sex.
The WNBPA Says It Will Not Be Used as a Political Weapon
The Women’s National Basketball Players Association eventually released one of the strongest statements during the controversy. The union emphasized its commitment to justice, equity, diversity and inclusion.
The WNBPA said: “We embrace justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. Those are the values that unite this Union and allow it to protect women’s sports while creating transformational change.” The union then addressed the treatment of transgender people during the debate: “Hate, abuse, and demonization of any person or group of people, including transgender people, only fuel fear, division, and harm.”
It ended with a clear message: “We will continue to have hard conversations. But we will not be used as political pawns.”
The statement did not answer the main question of whether transgender women should be eligible to play in the WNBA. Instead, the union focused on how the conversation should happen. The WNBPA said that women athletes should be able to have serious discussions about the future of women’s sports without transgender people becoming targets of hate or abuse.
That was especially important because the WNBPA is not just an organization making a public statement. It is the union that represents the WNBA players whose working conditions and eligibility rules are part of the collective bargaining process.
Cathy Engelbert Tries to Slow Down the Debate
WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert has taken a more cautious approach. As the controversy grew, Engelbert sent a memo to league personnel acknowledging that transgender-athlete participation was becoming a major topic.
She wrote:”I know many of you have received questions in recent weeks regarding transgender athlete participation in women’s basketball, and I expect this topic will continue to receive significant attention. I wanted to reach out to share how we are approaching these conversations at the league office and to thank those of you who have responded to questions from the media with thoughtfulness and professionalism.”
Engelbert then explained how the league planned to approach the issue. “First, we will always approach this topic thoughtfully, respectfully, and in alignment with the long-standing values of our league. Second, our player eligibility rules, unlike the eligibility rules of some other leagues and governing bodies, are collectively bargained.”
Engelbert also emphasized the importance of competitive fairness: “Lastly, preserving the integrity of our game and ensuring fair competition will always remain among the league’s highest priorities.”
Finally, Engelbert acknowledged that the issue was complicated and would take time to work through. “We recognize that this is a complex and nuanced topic, and we will continue to have important conversations with all of you and the Players Association in the weeks and months ahead.”
She also said the league would have additional discussions and listening sessions with team leaders. Engelbert did not specifically announce that transgender women were automatically eligible to play in the WNBA but she also did not announce a complete ban.
Instead, she pointed toward the collective bargaining process.
That is important because the controversy is not only about what Cathy Engelbert personally believes. It is about what the WNBA and its players’ union eventually agree should be written into the rules.
It should be noted that both players and those around the league had already been asking Cathy Engelbert to step down. This debate hasn’t helped that.
Enter Enes Kanter Freedom
The debate took another unexpected turn on August 7, 2026.
Former NBA center Enes Kanter Freedom announced that he was declaring himself a prospect for the 2027 WNBA Draft.
Freedom argued that he and his representatives had looked at the WNBA’s eligibility rules and believed the existing language did not specifically ban transgender athletes.
His announcement was presented as a challenge to the WNBA’s rules and its public statements about inclusion.
Freedom said: “I know my presence on the court will stir up strong opinions. I am definitely not here to mock, make fun of, or disrespect any community or personal choices. I’m simply asking that the current rules be applied equally to everyone — the rules that represent the very values many WNBA players and coaches have publicly advocated for.”
Freedom’s announcement was especially controversial because of his previous comments about transgender participation in women’s sports.
View this post on Instagram
In 2023, he had questioned whether identifying as a woman would allow him to play in the WNBA. His 2026 announcement turned that earlier hypothetical into an actual challenge to the league. However, Freedom declaring for the draft did not mean the WNBA had accepted him as eligible.
The WNBA’s collective bargaining agreement still says that only women are eligible to play. The league also had not announced that simply identifying as a woman is enough to meet its eligibility requirements.
A second former NBA player, Royce White, also announced plans to enter the 2027 WNBA Draft while identifying as a transgender woman for the purpose of professional basketball.
What Happens Next?
For now, the most important fact is simple: the WNBA has not announced that transgender women are or aren’t eligible to play.
The collective bargaining agreement says that only women are eligible, but the publicly available language does not provide a detailed definition of “woman” or a specific transgender-athlete eligibility process. That leaves the league with a major question to answer.
Engelbert’s memo suggests that the WNBA wants to discuss the issue with team executives and the players’ association instead of making a quick decision on its own.The league’s history already includes Layshia Clarendon, whose career helped make transgender and nonbinary identity more visible in professional women’s basketball.
But the debate today is different. It is no longer simply about whether a transgender person can belong in the WNBA community. It is about who qualifies to play in the highest level of women’s professional basketball.
Sophie Cunningham’s comments brought the issue into the spotlight. The protests in Seattle and Portland showed how quickly the debate could become a public confrontation. Statements from Stefanie Dolson, Cheryl Reeve and Gabby Williams showed that some people inside the WNBA see transgender inclusion as an important human-rights issue.
The WNBPA made clear that it wants to protect women’s sports while also rejecting hatred and political attacks against transgender people.
Then Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White turned an abstract question about the collective bargaining agreement into a real test of the league’s eligibility rules. Cathy Engelbert’s response has been to slow the process down.
The WNBA now has to answer two major questions: What does fairness in women’s professional basketball mean, and who gets to decide what that fairness looks like?
Because the league’s eligibility rules are part of a collective bargaining agreement, the final decision will not belong to the commissioner alone. It will involve the WNBA, the players’ union, the legal environment surrounding women’s sports and the athletes who actually play in the league.
For years, the question of transgender participation in the WNBA was mostly hypothetical. Now it is a real issue sitting directly in front of the league. And eventually, the WNBA will have to decide exactly what it means when its rules say: “Only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA.”
Should The NBA Be Concerned?
The true test of this will come after the WNBA season is over, when these conversations can really happen among league executives. But will this spill over into the NBA season? Will the conversation lend itself to transgender men playing in the NBA? And if not, why is it such an issue in the women’s league?
Will the league have to deal with the potential protest or courtside antics that the NBA has been riddled with?
With Enes Kanter Freedom more recently being ejected from a game after getting into it with transgender advocate and WNBA star, Natasha Cloud, it feels like the conversation is only growing louder and forcing more people to take notice.
Natasha Cloud scores, exchanges words with Enes Kanter, and he’s escorted from the game 👀pic.twitter.com/sHbIRLlrae
— ClutchPoints (@ClutchPoints) August 24, 2026
If this continues to be a conversation during the NBA season, it may have some serious implications
